Nabil Fares
Sep 17, 2021

This is a weaving of misrepresentations of Descartes’ view, the quantum mechanics view and other facile grandiose statements by the author. One of the few interesting statements I found was highlighting that a researcher pointed out that there might be a shortcut to calculating planetary motions.

ML might yet contribute a lot to physics but the author’s ‘inequality’ concept is neither mature nor articulated in any useful or insightful way. Perhaps something along Wolfram’s model might lead to a paradigm shift in science but Dr. Wolfram and his associates put a lot of creation, development and work into their speculations. This ‘lazy’ semantic weaving will not lead to anything.

In the end, this article may be fun to read but otherwise intellectually worth very little.

Responses (1)